CanonLaw.Ninja
A resource for both professional and armchair canonists.
Also including the GIRM, GILH, CCC, CCEO, DC, SST, ESI, USCCB Norms, and Vos estis.
Search
-
Section Numbers
-
Text Search
-
-
Documents
-
Document
The Sanctifying Function of the Church » The Sacraments » Marriage » The convalidation of marriage » Simple convalidation
Canon 1156. §1 To validate a marriage which is invalid because of a diriment impediment, it is required that the impediment cease or be dispensed, and that at least the party aware of the impediment renews consent.
§2 This renewal is required by ecclesiastical law for the validity of the validation, even if at the beginning both parties had given consent and had not afterwards withdrawn it.
§1. Ad convalidandum matrimonium irritum ob impedimentum dirimens, requiritur ut cesset impedimentum vel ab eodem dispensetur, et consensum renovet saltem pars impedimenti conscia.
§2. Haec renovatio iure ecclesiastico requiritur ad validitatem convalidationis, etiamsi initio utraque pars consensum praestiterit nec postea revocaverit.
§2 This renewal is required by ecclesiastical law for the validity of the validation, even if at the beginning both parties had given consent and had not afterwards withdrawn it.
§1. Ad convalidandum matrimonium irritum ob impedimentum dirimens, requiritur ut cesset impedimentum vel ab eodem dispensetur, et consensum renovet saltem pars impedimenti conscia.
§2. Haec renovatio iure ecclesiastico requiritur ad validitatem convalidationis, etiamsi initio utraque pars consensum praestiterit nec postea revocaverit.
Canon 1157. The renewal of consent must be a new act of will consenting to a marriage which the renewing party knows or thinks was invalid from the beginning.
Renovatio consensus debet esse novus voluntatis actus in matrimonium, quod pars renovans scit aut opinatur ab initio nullum fuisse.
Renovatio consensus debet esse novus voluntatis actus in matrimonium, quod pars renovans scit aut opinatur ab initio nullum fuisse.
Canon 1158. §1 If the impediment is public, consent is to be renewed by both parties in the canonical form, without prejudice to the provision of can. 1127 §3.
§2 If the impediment cannot be proved, it is sufficient that consent be renewed privately and in secret, specifically by the party who is aware of the impediment
provided the other party persists in the consent given, or by both parties if the impediment is known to both.
§1. Si impedimentum sit publicum, consensus ab utraque parte renovandus est forma canonica, salvo praescripto can. 1127, §2.
§2. Si impedimentum probari nequeat, satis est ut consensus renovetur privatim et secreto, et quidem a parte impedimenti conscia, dummodo altera in consensu praestito perseveret, aut ab utraque parte, si impedimentum sit utrique parti notum.
§2 If the impediment cannot be proved, it is sufficient that consent be renewed privately and in secret, specifically by the party who is aware of the impediment
provided the other party persists in the consent given, or by both parties if the impediment is known to both.
§1. Si impedimentum sit publicum, consensus ab utraque parte renovandus est forma canonica, salvo praescripto can. 1127, §2.
§2. Si impedimentum probari nequeat, satis est ut consensus renovetur privatim et secreto, et quidem a parte impedimenti conscia, dummodo altera in consensu praestito perseveret, aut ab utraque parte, si impedimentum sit utrique parti notum.
Canon 1159. §1 A marriage invalid because of a defect of consent is validated if the party who did not consent, now does consent, provided the consent given by the other party persists.
§2 If the defect of the consent cannot be proven, it is sufficient that the party who did not consent, gives consent privately and in secret.
§3 If the defect of consent can be proven, it is necessary that consent be given in the canonical form.
§1. Matrimonium irritum ob defectum consensus convalidatur, si pars quae non consenserat, iam consentiat, dummodo consensus ab altera parte praestitus perseveret.
§2. Si defectus consensus probari nequeat, satis est ut pars, quae non consenserat, privatim et secreto consensum praestet.
§3. Si defectus consensus probari potest, necesse est ut consensus forma canonica praestetur.
§2 If the defect of the consent cannot be proven, it is sufficient that the party who did not consent, gives consent privately and in secret.
§3 If the defect of consent can be proven, it is necessary that consent be given in the canonical form.
§1. Matrimonium irritum ob defectum consensus convalidatur, si pars quae non consenserat, iam consentiat, dummodo consensus ab altera parte praestitus perseveret.
§2. Si defectus consensus probari nequeat, satis est ut pars, quae non consenserat, privatim et secreto consensum praestet.
§3. Si defectus consensus probari potest, necesse est ut consensus forma canonica praestetur.
Canon 1160. For a marriage which is invalid because of defect of form to become valid, it must be contracted anew in the canonical form, without prejudice to the provisions of can. 1127 §3[4].
Matrimonium nullum ob defectum formae, ut validum fiat, contrahi denuo debet forma canonica, salvo praescripto can. 1127, §2.
Matrimonium nullum ob defectum formae, ut validum fiat, contrahi denuo debet forma canonica, salvo praescripto can. 1127, §2.
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds.