CanonLaw.Ninja

A resource for both professional and armchair canonists.

Also including the GIRM, GILH, CCC, CCEO, DC, USCCB Norms, and Vos estis.

What do you think of the new design? Provide feedback here!
The previous version still is available at old.canonlaw.ninja.

Search

  • Section Numbers
  • Text Search    

  • Documents
  •  

   

Document

Processes » The Contentious Trial » The Ordinary Contentious Trial » Challenging of the Sentence » Complaint of nullity against the sentence
Canon 1622. A sentence suffers from the defect of remediable nullity only if:

1. it was rendered by an illegitimate number of judges contrary to the prescript of can. 1425, §1;

2. it does not contain the motives or reasons for the decision;

3. it lacks the signatures prescribed by law;

4. it does not indicate the year, month, day, and place in which it was rendered;

5. it is based on a null judicial act whose nullity was not sanated according to the norm of can. 1619;

6. it was rendered against a party legitimately absent according to can. 1593, §2.
Canon 1623. A complaint of nullity in the cases mentioned in can. 1622 can be proposed within three months from the notice of the publication of the sentence.

Page generated in 0.0034 seconds.