CanonLaw.Ninja
A resource for both professional and armchair canonists.
Also including the GIRM, GILH, CCC, CCEO, DC, SST, ESI, USCCB Norms, and Vos estis.
Search
-
Section Numbers
-
Text Search
-
-
Documents
-
Document
Processes » The Contentious Trial » The Ordinary Contentious Trial » The Publication of the Acts, the Conclusion of the Case, and the Discussion of the Case
Canon 1600. Only in the following situations can the judge, after the conclusion of the case, still recall earlier witnesses or call new ones, or make provision for other evidence not previously requested:
1° in cases in which only the private good of the parties is involved if all the parties agree;
2° in other cases, provided that the parties have been consulted, that a grave reason exists, and that all danger of fraud or subornation is removed;
3° in all cases, whenever it is probable that, unless new evidence is admitted, the judgement will be unjust for any of the reasons mentioned in can. 1645 §2, nn. 1-3.
§2 The judge can, however, command or permit the presentation of a document which, even without fault of the interested party, could not be presented earlier.
§3 New evidence is to be published according to can. 1598 §1.
Previous Next1° in cases in which only the private good of the parties is involved if all the parties agree;
2° in other cases, provided that the parties have been consulted, that a grave reason exists, and that all danger of fraud or subornation is removed;
3° in all cases, whenever it is probable that, unless new evidence is admitted, the judgement will be unjust for any of the reasons mentioned in can. 1645 §2, nn. 1-3.
§2 The judge can, however, command or permit the presentation of a document which, even without fault of the interested party, could not be presented earlier.
§3 New evidence is to be published according to can. 1598 §1.
Page generated in 0.0026 seconds.